Emotions · 15–25 MIN · ADULTS / FACILITATED GROUPS
Impact, Identity, or Repair?
Sort a fictional response into specific accountability, global shame, and possible repair.
Try the experienceUNDERSTAND
What is happening here?
A person can recognize harm without making a total judgment about their worth. Separating impact from identity can make a repair conversation more specific. The harmed person retains their own boundaries and does not owe reassurance or reconciliation.
Conceptual background
Behavioral Tech Institute · Emotion regulation. This reference supports the broad concept; it does not validate or endorse this original exercise.
PRACTICE WITH PURPOSE
How to use it
- Read each fictional card and choose the category that best describes it.
- Reveal the explanations and revise a placement if a different distinction is useful.
- Apply one distinction to a manageable example or a question for your clinician.
Sort & compare
Explore · Adjust · ReflectYour workspace
Use a fictional or manageable example. Responses stay in this tab and are not submitted or automatically saved. Export and print include what you enter. You may observe, adapt, or pass.
MAKE IT USEFUL
Notice. Discuss. Take one thing.
For thoughtful facilitation
Open with the concept, demonstrate one fictional example, allow individual exploration or paired discussion, and close with one optional takeaway. Ask what fits the participant’s culture, language, access needs, and present capacity. Invite observation instead of disclosure; do not interpret participation as a measure of motivation.
Fit and care: Use manageable or fictional examples and adapt within competence. This is educational practice, not diagnosis, crisis care, or individualized treatment.
Original AI-assisted educational activity; independent clinical review pending. This is not an assessment, a complete treatment protocol, or emergency care. No automated risk scoring or outcome claims are made.