MORE THAN THERAPYTHE RESOURCE LIBRARY

QUALITY AND TRANSPARENCY

Clear about our resources.

Useful educational material needs clear authorship, understandable instructions, appropriate limits, and a traceable review process.

What each review step means

Source and editorial checks

Check the conceptual references, purpose, instructions, intended audience, wording, and document layout. These checks do not establish clinical validation or effectiveness.

Understandability and use

Ask intended readers to explain the page’s purpose and next step in their own words. Record unclear wording and practical barriers. A structured educational-material review can support this process.

Independent clinical review

A qualified reviewer examines the specific resource version, its scope, audience fit, clinical limits, and adaptation guidance. Record the reviewer, relevant qualifications, date, scope, and any required changes.

Revision and follow-up

Record meaningful changes and keep resource identifiers stable. Substantial revisions need a new review; an older review should not silently carry over to different content.

How review information appears

A resource is shown as independently reviewed only when a reviewer, review date, and reviewed version are recorded for the current content. Until then, it stays marked as pending. A qualified review would still not establish the worksheet as a validated measure or an effective treatment.

References identify ideas that informed the original writing. Listing a source does not mean that its authors reviewed or endorsed the More Than Therapy resource.

Help us improve a page

Useful feedback identifies the resource, its version, and a concrete issue: unclear instructions, formatting, a source concern, audience mismatch, or cultural context. Describe the material without including client names, completed worksheet answers, or identifying details.

Draft resource feedback

The link opens an email draft in your email app. It does not send a message automatically.

Accessible formats

The site provides readable HTML, fillable PDFs, and selected large-print and handwriting editions. The current PDFs have not been certified for PDF/UA accessibility. Use the format that fits the reader and report barriers so they can be addressed.

References for the review approach